Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use n_adapts instead of nadapts #375

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

Use n_adapts instead of nadapts #375

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

devmotion
Copy link
Member

Some code, tests, and even the README used nadapts instead of n_adapts. I replaced all occurrences of nadapts with n_adapts. Additionally, I thought it would be good to error out loudly if a user or package actually uses the non-functional nadapts keyword argument.

torfjelde
torfjelde previously approved these changes Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Member

@torfjelde torfjelde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome; thanks @devmotion :)

Maybe bump patch version?

devmotion and others added 2 commits October 3, 2024 18:21
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@devmotion devmotion requested a review from torfjelde October 3, 2024 18:13
@devmotion
Copy link
Member Author

Still fine @torfjelde?

Copy link
Member

@torfjelde torfjelde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aye, very much so:)

@devmotion devmotion merged commit 85bf5fe into master Oct 4, 2024
16 checks passed
@devmotion devmotion deleted the dw/nadapts branch October 4, 2024 12:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants