You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It could make sense, but it would be only using the vector instance of MonoFunctor for instance, as it is only mapping the data. I'm not keen to add a dependency to JuicyPixels at this point, as it's already working without much dependencies.
Would it make sense to have a
MonoFunctor
orRFunctor
instance for Image?MonoFunctor
:https://hackage.haskell.org/package/mono-traversable-0.10.1/docs/Data-MonoTraversable.html#t:MonoFunctor
RFunctor
:http://hackage.haskell.org/package/rmonad-0.4.1/docs/Control-RMonad.html#t:RFunctor
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: