Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement no-multiplicity rule in geography #29

Closed
tucotuco opened this issue May 15, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Implement no-multiplicity rule in geography #29

tucotuco opened this issue May 15, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
@tucotuco

Comments

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

There are still geography vocabs that give a list of named places separated by commas, such as "Wyoming, Montana". These should be omitted following the rule that the values must be standard values for a single administrative region.
@tucotuco tucotuco self-assigned this May 16, 2018
@tucotuco tucotuco mentioned this issue May 16, 2018
Open
@tucotuco
Copy link
Member Author

Same as #24.

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member Author

Implemented in commit a1e2301.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@tucotuco tucotuco

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tucotuco