transition from terraform/terraspace to pulumi #9
Conversation
💰 Infracost reportMonthly estimate decreased by $11 📉
*Usage costs can be estimated by updating Infracost Cloud settings, see docs for other options. Estimate details (includes details of skipped projects due to errors) |
WalkthroughThis pull request includes significant changes, primarily transitioning from Terraform and Terraspace to Pulumi for infrastructure management. Key modifications involve the removal of Terraform-related files and configurations, the introduction of new Pulumi-specific files, and updates to various GitHub Actions workflows to support automated processes. Documentation has been updated to reflect these changes, including new guides for repository synchronization and handling workflow permissions. Additionally, several new files for configuration and linting have been added to enhance development practices. Changes
Possibly related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 62
🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
Makefile (1)
Line range hint
1-39: Add environment validation for safe infrastructure operations.Given this is a breaking change transitioning from Terraform to Pulumi, it's crucial to add safeguards to prevent accidental infrastructure modifications.
Consider adding these safety measures:
- Environment validation target:
validate-env: ## Validate required environment variables @test -f $(ENV_FILE) || (echo "Error: $(ENV_FILE) file not found" && exit 1) @grep -q '^PULUMI_BACKEND_URL=' $(ENV_FILE) || (echo "Error: PULUMI_BACKEND_URL not set in $(ENV_FILE)" && exit 1) @grep -q '^PULUMI_CONFIG_PASSPHRASE=' $(ENV_FILE) || (echo "Error: PULUMI_CONFIG_PASSPHRASE not set in $(ENV_FILE)" && exit 1)
- Add validation as a prerequisite to Pulumi operations:
pulumi-preview: validate-env pulumi-up: validate-envThis ensures that necessary environment variables are set before executing infrastructure changes.
README.md (1)
Update remaining Terraform references to align with Pulumi migration
The README still contains outdated references to Terraform and Terraspace that need to be updated:
- Line 13: "terraform related checks" should be updated to "infrastructure related checks"
- Line 55: "Docker container with terraspace and terraform" should be updated to "Docker container with Pulumi"
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-75: Verify documentation completeness for Pulumi migration.While the README has been updated to reflect the Pulumi migration, please ensure the following aspects are covered:
- Migration guide for existing users
- Rollback procedures
- State management considerations
- Environment-specific configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining Terraform/Terraspace references echo "Checking for remaining Terraform/Terraspace references..." rg -i "terraform|terraspace" --type mdLength of output: 361
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~76-~76: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ... instructions and examples. ## Security Please disclose any vulnerabilities found resp...(PLEASE_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
76-76: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
docs/plan.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngpulumi/poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (36)
.env.dist(0 hunks).github/AUTORELEASE.md(1 hunks).github/TEMPLATE_SYNC_APP.md(1 hunks).github/TEMPLATE_SYNC_PAT.md(1 hunks).github/dependabot.yml(1 hunks).github/linters/.yaml-lint.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/autoprerelase.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/autorelease.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/checkov.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/infracost.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/inframap.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/super-linter.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tempate-sync-pat.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/template-sync-app.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/terrascan.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/tf_docs.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/tf_format.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/tf_validate.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/tflint.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/tfsec.yml(0 hunks).gitignore(0 hunks)Dockerfile(1 hunks)Makefile(2 hunks)README.md(4 hunks)docker-compose.yml(1 hunks)pulumi/.flake8(1 hunks)pulumi/.gitignore(1 hunks)pulumi/.pre-commit-config.yaml(1 hunks)pulumi/Pulumi.example.yaml(1 hunks)pulumi/Pulumi.yaml(1 hunks)pulumi/__main__.py(1 hunks)pulumi/pyproject.toml(1 hunks)terraform/.dcignore(0 hunks)terraform/.terraform.lock.hcl(0 hunks)terraform/main.tf(0 hunks)terraform/path.json(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (16)
- .env.dist
- .github/workflows/autoprerelase.yml
- .github/workflows/checkov.yml
- .github/workflows/infracost.yml
- .github/workflows/inframap.yml
- .github/workflows/terrascan.yml
- .github/workflows/tf_docs.yml
- .github/workflows/tf_format.yml
- .github/workflows/tf_validate.yml
- .github/workflows/tflint.yml
- .github/workflows/tfsec.yml
- .gitignore
- terraform/.dcignore
- terraform/.terraform.lock.hcl
- terraform/main.tf
- terraform/path.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/AUTORELEASE.md
[style] ~16-~16: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...e project’s history. Speed: Automation speeds up the process of releasing and deploying ...
(SPEED_UP_ACCELERATE)
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...ge). Click on New GitHub App. Once you are creating a new GitHub app, make sure to configur...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
[uncategorized] ~37-~37: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...te key. Copy that private key to a safe place and then copy the app ID. You will need...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~38-~38: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...repository secrets. You can easily find ID here(Settings > Application > configure...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
README.md
[style] ~8-~8: The phrase ‘a lot of’ might be wordy and overused. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ...ent and convenient make cli command - A lot of CI checks to ensure the highest code qu...
(A_LOT_OF)
🪛 Markdownlint
.github/AUTORELEASE.md
3-3: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
7-7: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
7-7: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
19-19: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
19-19: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
20-20: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
20-20: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
21-21: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
39-39: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
39-39: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
41-41: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
41-41: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
43-43: null
Files should end with a single newline character
(MD047, single-trailing-newline)
.github/TEMPLATE_SYNC_APP.md
58-58: null
Files should end with a single newline character
(MD047, single-trailing-newline)
.github/TEMPLATE_SYNC_PAT.md
12-12: Expected: 1; Actual: 2; Style: 1/2/3
Ordered list item prefix
(MD029, ol-prefix)
14-14: Expected: 2; Actual: 3; Style: 1/2/3
Ordered list item prefix
(MD029, ol-prefix)
51-51: Expected: 3; Actual: 4; Style: 1/2/3
Ordered list item prefix
(MD029, ol-prefix)
56-56: null
Files should end with a single newline character
(MD047, single-trailing-newline)
README.md
6-6: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
🪛 yamllint
.github/dependabot.yml
[error] 6-6: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
.github/linters/.yaml-lint.yml
[warning] 8-8: too few spaces before comment
(comments)
[warning] 12-12: too few spaces before comment
(comments)
[warning] 18-18: too few spaces before comment
(comments)
[warning] 21-21: too few spaces before comment
(comments)
[warning] 24-24: too few spaces before comment
(comments)
[warning] 27-27: too few spaces before comment
(comments)
[warning] 30-30: too few spaces before comment
(comments)
[error] 34-34: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
.github/workflows/autorelease.yml
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
[error] 39-39: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
.github/workflows/super-linter.yml
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
[error] 50-50: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
.github/workflows/tempate-sync-pat.yml
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
[error] 26-26: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
.github/workflows/template-sync-app.yml
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
[error] 30-30: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
pulumi/.pre-commit-config.yaml
[error] 2-2: too many spaces after hyphen
(hyphens)
[error] 14-14: too many spaces after hyphen
(hyphens)
[error] 19-19: too many spaces after hyphen
(hyphens)
[error] 22-22: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/autorelease.yml
20-20: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 Hadolint
Dockerfile
[warning] 10-10: Pin versions in apt get install. Instead of apt-get install <package> use apt-get install <package>=<version>
(DL3008)
[warning] 28-28: Set the SHELL option -o pipefail before RUN with a pipe in it. If you are using /bin/sh in an alpine image or if your shell is symlinked to busybox then consider explicitly setting your SHELL to /bin/ash, or disable this check
(DL4006)
[warning] 31-31: Set the SHELL option -o pipefail before RUN with a pipe in it. If you are using /bin/sh in an alpine image or if your shell is symlinked to busybox then consider explicitly setting your SHELL to /bin/ash, or disable this check
(DL4006)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
pulumi/.gitignore (1)
1-2: Verify the handling of sensitive data across the codebase.
Given that .env.dist was removed as part of this PR, we should verify that sensitive data handling is properly documented and that all potential credential files are properly ignored.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of the identified files and search for any additional sensitive data patterns.
Sensitive data handling appears to be properly configured
The verification shows that sensitive data handling is appropriately set up:
- The
docker-compose.ymlcorrectly uses environment variables for AWS credentials without hardcoding - Pre-commit hooks include
detect-private-keyto prevent accidental commits of private keys - No
.envfiles were found in the repository .gitignorecontains common Python-specific patterns that could contain secrets (*.pyc,venv/)- The removal of
.env.distis acceptable as the repository uses environment variables directly
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential credential files and documentation
# about credentials management
echo "Checking for potential credential files..."
rg -l '(?i)(secret|password|credential|token|key)' --type yaml --type json
echo -e "\nChecking for documentation about credentials management..."
rg -l '(?i)(credential|secret).*management' --type md
Length of output: 410
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of identified files and search for additional patterns
echo "Content of docker-compose.yml:"
cat docker-compose.yml
echo -e "\nContent of pulumi/.pre-commit-config.yaml:"
cat pulumi/.pre-commit-config.yaml
echo -e "\nChecking for .env files:"
fd -H "\.env"
echo -e "\nChecking for additional sensitive patterns:"
rg -l '(?i)(api[_-]?key|auth|jwt|oauth|private[_-]?key|\.pem$|\.key$|\.pfx$|\.p12$|\.keystore$|\.jks$)'
echo -e "\nChecking .gitignore files for sensitive patterns:"
find . -name ".gitignore" -exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 1942
pulumi/.flake8 (1)
1-2: LGTM! Basic flake8 configuration is in place.
The configuration correctly excludes version control and virtual environment directories from linting.
.github/dependabot.yml (1)
3-4: Verify the Pulumi directory path exists.
The configuration points to the "pulumi" directory. Let's verify this directory exists in the repository.
✅ Verification successful
Directory path in Dependabot configuration is valid and contains Python files
The "pulumi" directory exists at the repository root and contains Python code (__main__.py), confirming that the Dependabot configuration path is correct for managing Python dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the pulumi directory and its Python files
# Check if the pulumi directory exists and contains Python files
if fd -t d '^pulumi$' ; then
echo "✓ Directory exists"
echo "Python files found:"
fd -e py . pulumi/
else
echo "✗ Directory not found"
fi
Length of output: 164
pulumi/Pulumi.yaml (2)
3-6: Verify Poetry configuration is complete.
The configuration specifies Poetry as the toolchain. Let's verify the required Poetry setup is in place.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Poetry configuration exists and contains required Pulumi dependencies
# Check for pyproject.toml
echo "Checking for pyproject.toml..."
if ! fd -t f "pyproject.toml"; then
echo "Warning: pyproject.toml not found"
exit 1
fi
# Check for poetry.lock
echo "Checking for poetry.lock..."
if ! fd -t f "poetry.lock"; then
echo "Warning: poetry.lock not found"
exit 1
fi
# Verify Pulumi dependencies in pyproject.toml
echo "Checking for Pulumi dependencies..."
rg "pulumi" pyproject.toml1-10: Verify configuration against Pulumi's best practices.
The basic structure looks good, but let's ensure it follows all of Pulumi's recommended practices for project configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Configuration follows Pulumi best practices with minor recommendations
The configuration is well-structured and follows Pulumi's core practices with:
- Correct runtime configuration for Python with Poetry toolchain
- Proper dependencies in pyproject.toml (pulumi and pulumi-aws)
- Basic project tagging in place
- Example configuration file present (Pulumi.example.yaml)
Recommendations for completeness:
- Consider adding stack-specific configs (Pulumi.dev.yaml, Pulumi.prod.yaml) for different environments
- Add a README.md in the pulumi directory with setup instructions and stack management details
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Pulumi configuration structure and related files
# Check for Pulumi.dev.yaml and Pulumi.prod.yaml (common stack configurations)
echo "Checking for stack-specific configurations..."
fd -t f "Pulumi\.(dev|prod)\.yaml"
# Check for backend configuration
echo "Checking for backend configuration..."
rg "backend:" .
# Check for README with Pulumi setup instructions
echo "Checking for Pulumi documentation..."
rg -l "pulumi" README.md
# Look for sensitive information in Pulumi configs
echo "Checking for potential sensitive information in Pulumi configs..."
rg -i "(password|secret|key|token)" "Pulumi*.yaml"
Length of output: 576
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the Pulumi configuration more systematically
# Check for stack-specific configurations
echo "=== Stack Configurations ==="
ls -la pulumi/Pulumi*.yaml
# Check Pulumi dependencies in pyproject.toml
echo -e "\n=== Pulumi Dependencies ==="
cat pulumi/pyproject.toml | grep -A 5 dependencies
# Check for backend configuration in main Pulumi config
echo -e "\n=== Backend Configuration ==="
cat pulumi/Pulumi.yaml
# Check for README with setup instructions
echo -e "\n=== Documentation ==="
if [ -f pulumi/README.md ]; then
cat pulumi/README.md
fi
Length of output: 900
pulumi/pyproject.toml (3)
1-3: LGTM: Build system configuration is correct.
The build system configuration properly specifies poetry-core as the build backend.
5-7: LGTM: Poetry configuration is appropriate for an infrastructure project.
Setting package-mode = false is correct as this is an infrastructure application, not a library.
8-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Restructure dependencies and consider additional dev tools.
There are several issues with the current dependencies configuration:
- Development tools (black, flake8, pre-commit) should be under
[tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies] - Consider relaxing the Python version constraint to allow for wider compatibility
- Consider adding additional development dependencies useful for Pulumi development
Apply this diff to restructure the dependencies:
[tool.poetry.dependencies]
pulumi = "^3.138"
pulumi-aws = "^6.58"
-python = "^3.9"
+python = ">=3.9,<4.0"
-black = "^24.10.0"
-flake8 = "^7.1.1"
-pre-commit = "^4.0.1"
+
+[tool.poetry.group.dev.dependencies]
+black = "^24.10.0"
+flake8 = "^7.1.1"
+pre-commit = "^4.0.1"
+pylint = "^3.0.3"
+mypy = "^1.8.0"
+pytest = "^8.0.0"
+pytest-cov = "^4.1.0"The changes:
- Move development tools to their correct group
- Add type checking (mypy), additional linting (pylint), and testing tools (pytest)
- Adjust Python version constraint to be more flexible while maintaining compatibility
.github/workflows/tempate-sync-pat.yml (1)
3-6: LGTM! Well-configured workflow triggers.
The combination of monthly scheduled runs and manual trigger provides good flexibility for template synchronization.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
.github/linters/.yaml-lint.yml (1)
1-4: LGTM! Base configuration is appropriate.
The configuration extends the default ruleset and disables the document start marker requirement, which is a common and acceptable practice for modern YAML files.
.github/workflows/template-sync-app.yml (4)
3-6: LGTM! Well-structured workflow triggers.
The combination of scheduled (Monday 9 AM UTC) and manual triggers provides good flexibility for template synchronization.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
12-17: LGTM! Secure authentication using GitHub App.
Using a GitHub App for authentication is a secure approach as it:
- Provides fine-grained permissions
- Supports automatic token rotation
- Allows better audit logging
19-22: LGTM! Proper repository checkout configuration.
The checkout step is well-configured, using the latest major version and the generated GitHub App token.
24-30: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Verify the source repository path.
The template sync configuration looks good, but let's verify that the source repository path is correct and accessible.
Nitpick: Add a newline at the end of the file to comply with YAML best practices.
upstream_branch: main
pr_labels: template_sync
+✅ Verification successful
Source repository path is valid and accessible
The source repository VilnaCRM-Org/php-service-template exists, is public, and has main as its default branch which matches the configured upstream_branch. The template sync configuration is correct.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the source repository exists and is accessible
gh repo view VilnaCRM-Org/php-service-template --json name,isPrivate,defaultBranchRef || echo "Repository not found or not accessible"
Length of output: 172
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 30-30: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Makefile (1)
6-6: LGTM: Clear variable definitions for Docker Compose and Pulumi.
The variables are well-structured and follow Makefile conventions. The EXEC_APP variable properly combines DOCKER_COMPOSE with the service name for consistent container execution.
Also applies to: 10-11
.github/workflows/autorelease.yml (3)
1-7: LGTM: Workflow trigger configuration is appropriate.
The workflow name and trigger configuration are well-structured for a release automation workflow.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
13-18: Excellent security improvement using GitHub App authentication.
The transition to GitHub App-based authentication is a significant security improvement over static tokens. This approach:
- Provides better audit trails
- Supports automatic token rotation
- Allows fine-grained permissions control
1-39: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Verify workflow permissions for Pulumi operations.
As part of the Terraform to Pulumi migration, we should ensure this workflow has appropriate permissions for Pulumi operations.
Consider adding explicit permissions block for Pulumi operations:
jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+ permissions:
+ # Required for creating releases
+ contents: write
+ # Required if Pulumi needs to manage GitHub resources
+ pull-requests: write
+ issues: writeRun this verification script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze workflow permissions and Pulumi configurations
# Check for Pulumi-related workflows and their permissions
echo "Analyzing Pulumi-related workflows:"
find .github/workflows -type f -exec sh -c '
echo "\nChecking {}"
grep -B2 -A2 "pulumi" "{}" || true
grep -B2 -A2 "permissions:" "{}" || true
' \;
# Check for Pulumi configuration files
echo "\nAnalyzing Pulumi configuration:"
find . -name "Pulumi.yaml" -o -name "Pulumi.*.yaml"🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
20-20: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
[error] 39-39: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Dockerfile (1)
1-2: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add SHELL instruction with pipefail option.
To prevent undetected failures in pipe operations, add the SHELL instruction with appropriate options.
# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1
+SHELL ["/bin/bash", "-o", "pipefail", "-c"]
FROM python:3.11-slimLikely invalid or redundant comment.
.github/workflows/super-linter.yml (3)
1-6: LGTM: Workflow trigger configuration is appropriate.
The workflow is correctly configured to run on pull requests targeting the main branch.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]
(truthy)
7-23: LGTM: Secure authentication setup using GitHub App tokens.
Good security practice using GitHub App tokens instead of personal access tokens. The full repository history fetch is appropriate for comprehensive linting.
39-49: LGTM: Auto-commit configuration is well structured.
The configuration correctly handles automatic commits of linting fixes with appropriate conditions to avoid running on the default branch.
| *.pyc | ||
| venv/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
LGTM! But consider adding more essential ignore patterns.
While the current patterns are correct, consider adding these essential patterns for a Pulumi Python project:
*.pyc
venv/
+# Python
+__pycache__/
+*.py[cod]
+*$py.class
+*.so
+.Python
+build/
+develop-eggs/
+dist/
+downloads/
+eggs/
+.eggs/
+lib/
+lib64/
+parts/
+sdist/
+var/
+wheels/
+*.egg-info/
+
+# Pulumi
+Pulumi.*.yaml
+.pulumi/
+
+# Secrets and local settings
+.env
+.venv
+.secrets/
+credentials.json
+```
The additions include:
1. Common Python build artifacts and cache directories
2. Pulumi-specific files that might contain sensitive stack configuration
3. Various credential and environment files to prevent accidental commits of sensitive data
<!-- suggestion_start -->
<details>
<summary>📝 Committable suggestion</summary>
> ‼️ **IMPORTANT**
> Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
`````suggestion
*.pyc
venv/
# Python
__pycache__/
*.py[cod]
*$py.class
*.so
.Python
build/
develop-eggs/
dist/
downloads/
eggs/
.eggs/
lib/
lib64/
parts/
sdist/
var/
wheels/
*.egg-info/
# Pulumi
Pulumi.*.yaml
.pulumi/
# Secrets and local settings
.env
.venv
.secrets/
credentials.json| [flake8] | ||
| exclude = .git,.venv |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider enhancing the flake8 configuration with additional rules.
While the current configuration is functional, consider adding these commonly used flake8 settings for better code quality control:
[flake8]
-exclude = .git,.venv
+exclude = .git,.venv,__pycache__,build,dist
+max-line-length = 88
+extend-ignore = E203
+max-complexity = 10
+statistics = True
+count = TrueThese additions would:
- Exclude more common Python artifacts
- Set max line length (88 chars matches black formatter)
- Ignore E203 for compatibility with black
- Set maximum cyclomatic complexity
- Enable statistics reporting
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| [flake8] | |
| exclude = .git,.venv | |
| [flake8] | |
| exclude = .git,.venv,__pycache__,build,dist | |
| max-line-length = 88 | |
| extend-ignore = E203 | |
| max-complexity = 10 | |
| statistics = True | |
| count = True |
| version: 2 | ||
| updates: | ||
| - package-ecosystem: "pip" | ||
| directory: "pulumi" | ||
| schedule: | ||
| interval: "weekly" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance Dependabot configuration for better PR management.
While the basic configuration is functional, consider adding these options to improve the PR workflow:
version: 2
updates:
- package-ecosystem: "pip"
directory: "pulumi"
schedule:
interval: "weekly"
+ commit-message:
+ prefix: "deps(pulumi)"
+ include: "scope"
+ labels:
+ - "dependencies"
+ - "pulumi"
+ reviewers:
+ - "Kravalg"
+ versioning-strategy: increase-if-necessary
+ open-pull-requests-limit: 5Also, add a newline at the end of the file to fix the YAML linting error.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| version: 2 | |
| updates: | |
| - package-ecosystem: "pip" | |
| directory: "pulumi" | |
| schedule: | |
| interval: "weekly" | |
| version: 2 | |
| updates: | |
| - package-ecosystem: "pip" | |
| directory: "pulumi" | |
| schedule: | |
| interval: "weekly" | |
| commit-message: | |
| prefix: "deps(pulumi)" | |
| include: "scope" | |
| labels: | |
| - "dependencies" | |
| - "pulumi" | |
| reviewers: | |
| - "Kravalg" | |
| versioning-strategy: increase-if-necessary | |
| open-pull-requests-limit: 5 | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 6-6: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
| config: | ||
| aws:region: eu-central-1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Make example configuration more generic
For an example configuration file, it's better to use placeholder values that make it clear users need to customize them for their environment.
Consider making the region configurable:
config:
- aws:region: eu-central-1
+ aws:region: <your-aws-region>Also, consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each configuration option and possible values.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| config: | |
| aws:region: eu-central-1 | |
| config: | |
| aws:region: <your-aws-region> |
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| encryptionsalt: v1:743+cS1LkJk=:v1:HKR8mWLdDmilWmBO:oHoHMjDpYo5OaC7psX12k3jSbDSvpA== | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security Risk: Remove sensitive encryption salt from example configuration
The encryption salt should not be committed to version control, especially in an example configuration file. This value is used to encrypt sensitive configuration values and should be unique for each environment.
Replace the actual encryption salt with a placeholder value:
-encryptionsalt: v1:743+cS1LkJk=:v1:HKR8mWLdDmilWmBO:oHoHMjDpYo5OaC7psX12k3jSbDSvpA==
+encryptionsalt: <your-encryption-salt-here>Also, consider adding this file to .gitignore and providing a template file instead (e.g., Pulumi.example.yaml.template).
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| encryptionsalt: v1:743+cS1LkJk=:v1:HKR8mWLdDmilWmBO:oHoHMjDpYo5OaC7psX12k3jSbDSvpA== | |
| encryptionsalt: <your-encryption-salt-here> |
| # Autorelease action | ||
|
|
||
| ## Overview | ||
| Auto-release workflows automate the process of creating software releases in response to specific triggers like merging a pull request or pushing to a certain branch. This automation helps streamline the development process, reduce human error, and ensure consistent release practices. | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
| ## Why You Might Need Auto-Release | ||
| Consistency: Automating the release process ensures that every release adheres to predefined standards and procedures, reducing the risk of human error and inconsistency in the release quality. | ||
|
|
||
| Efficiency: By automating the changelog generation and release process, teams can save time and focus on development and testing rather than on the operational details of creating a release. | ||
|
|
||
| Integration: Auto-release workflows can be integrated with other tools and workflows, such as continuous integration (CI) systems, to ensure that releases are made only when all tests pass, maintaining the quality of the code in the production. | ||
|
|
||
| Traceability: Automated releases include detailed logs and changelogs, providing a clear audit trail for changes, which is beneficial for debugging and understanding the project’s history. | ||
|
|
||
| Speed: Automation speeds up the process of releasing and deploying software, which is especially crucial in high-paced agile environments where multiple releases might occur in a single day. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance document formatting and readability.
The content is well-structured, but some formatting improvements would enhance readability.
Apply these changes:
# Autorelease action
## Overview
+
Auto-release workflows automate the process of creating software releases in response to specific triggers like merging a pull request or pushing to a certain branch. This automation helps streamline the development process, reduce human error, and ensure consistent release practices.
---
+
## Why You Might Need Auto-Release
+
Consistency: Automating the release process ensures that every release adheres to predefined standards and procedures, reducing the risk of human error and inconsistency in the release quality.
Efficiency: By automating the changelog generation and release process, teams can save time and focus on development and testing rather than on the operational details of creating a release.
Integration: Auto-release workflows can be integrated with other tools and workflows, such as continuous integration (CI) systems, to ensure that releases are made only when all tests pass, maintaining the quality of the code in the production.
Traceability: Automated releases include detailed logs and changelogs, providing a clear audit trail for changes, which is beneficial for debugging and understanding the project's history.
-Speed: Automation speeds up the process of releasing and deploying software, which is especially crucial in high-paced agile environments where multiple releases might occur in a single day.
+Speed: Automation accelerates the process of releasing and deploying software, which is especially crucial in high-paced agile environments where multiple releases might occur in a single day.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Autorelease action | |
| ## Overview | |
| Auto-release workflows automate the process of creating software releases in response to specific triggers like merging a pull request or pushing to a certain branch. This automation helps streamline the development process, reduce human error, and ensure consistent release practices. | |
| --- | |
| ## Why You Might Need Auto-Release | |
| Consistency: Automating the release process ensures that every release adheres to predefined standards and procedures, reducing the risk of human error and inconsistency in the release quality. | |
| Efficiency: By automating the changelog generation and release process, teams can save time and focus on development and testing rather than on the operational details of creating a release. | |
| Integration: Auto-release workflows can be integrated with other tools and workflows, such as continuous integration (CI) systems, to ensure that releases are made only when all tests pass, maintaining the quality of the code in the production. | |
| Traceability: Automated releases include detailed logs and changelogs, providing a clear audit trail for changes, which is beneficial for debugging and understanding the project’s history. | |
| Speed: Automation speeds up the process of releasing and deploying software, which is especially crucial in high-paced agile environments where multiple releases might occur in a single day. | |
| # Autorelease action | |
| ## Overview | |
| Auto-release workflows automate the process of creating software releases in response to specific triggers like merging a pull request or pushing to a certain branch. This automation helps streamline the development process, reduce human error, and ensure consistent release practices. | |
| --- | |
| ## Why You Might Need Auto-Release | |
| Consistency: Automating the release process ensures that every release adheres to predefined standards and procedures, reducing the risk of human error and inconsistency in the release quality. | |
| Efficiency: By automating the changelog generation and release process, teams can save time and focus on development and testing rather than on the operational details of creating a release. | |
| Integration: Auto-release workflows can be integrated with other tools and workflows, such as continuous integration (CI) systems, to ensure that releases are made only when all tests pass, maintaining the quality of the code in the production. | |
| Traceability: Automated releases include detailed logs and changelogs, providing a clear audit trail for changes, which is beneficial for debugging and understanding the project's history. | |
| Speed: Automation accelerates the process of releasing and deploying software, which is especially crucial in high-paced agile environments where multiple releases might occur in a single day. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~16-~16: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...e project’s history. Speed: Automation speeds up the process of releasing and deploying ...
(SPEED_UP_ACCELERATE)
🪛 Markdownlint
3-3: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
7-7: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
7-7: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
| down Stop the docker hub | ||
| pulumi Pulumi enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. | ||
| sh Log to the docker container | ||
| start Docker container with terraspace and terraform |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update start command description to reflect Pulumi usage.
The description still references terraspace and terraform.
-start Docker container with terraspace and terraform
+start Initialize and start Pulumi development environment📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| start Docker container with terraspace and terraform | |
| start Initialize and start Pulumi development environment |
| When setting up the repository synchronization, you may encounter permission-related issues. Below are two methods to resolve common workflow permissions errors: using a Personal Access Token (PAT) or using a GitHub App. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add security best practices for repository synchronization.
While the permissions setup is well documented, consider adding security recommendations.
When setting up the repository synchronization, you may encounter permission-related issues. Below are two methods to resolve common workflow permissions errors: using a Personal Access Token (PAT) or using a GitHub App.
+Important security considerations:
+- Use the principle of least privilege when granting permissions
+- Regularly rotate credentials (PATs and GitHub App keys)
+- Monitor synchronization logs for unauthorized access attempts📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| When setting up the repository synchronization, you may encounter permission-related issues. Below are two methods to resolve common workflow permissions errors: using a Personal Access Token (PAT) or using a GitHub App. | |
| When setting up the repository synchronization, you may encounter permission-related issues. Below are two methods to resolve common workflow permissions errors: using a Personal Access Token (PAT) or using a GitHub App. | |
| Important security considerations: | |
| - Use the principle of least privilege when granting permissions | |
| - Regularly rotate credentials (PATs and GitHub App keys) | |
| - Monitor synchronization logs for unauthorized access attempts |
| - Built-in docker environment and convenient `make` cli command | ||
| - A lot of CI checks to ensure the highest code quality that can be ([checkov](https://www.checkov.io/), [infracost](https://www.infracost.io/), [inframap](https://github.com/cycloidio/inframap), [terrascan](https://runterrascan.io/) and other terraform related checks) | ||
| - A lot of CI checks to ensure the highest code quality that can be (linters and other terraform related checks) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update CI checks description to reflect Pulumi migration.
The current description still references "terraform related checks" which is inconsistent with the migration to Pulumi.
-A lot of CI checks to ensure the highest code quality that can be (linters and other terraform related checks)
+CI checks to ensure the highest code quality through linters and infrastructure validation📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - A lot of CI checks to ensure the highest code quality that can be (linters and other terraform related checks) | |
| CI checks to ensure the highest code quality through linters and infrastructure validation |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~8-~8: The phrase ‘a lot of’ might be wordy and overused. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ...ent and convenient make cli command - A lot of CI checks to ensure the highest code qu...
(A_LOT_OF)
| Use `make` command to set up project and automatically install all needed dependencies | ||
| > make start | ||
|
|
||
| Check [Getting started](https://terraspace.cloud/getting-started/) section to manage your infrastructure | ||
| Check [Getting started](https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/get-started/aws/review-project/) section to manage your infrastructure |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance installation instructions with Pulumi prerequisites.
The installation section should include steps for setting up Pulumi CLI and configuring cloud provider credentials.
Use `make` command to set up project and automatically install all needed dependencies
> make start
+Before starting, ensure you have:
+1. Installed [Pulumi CLI](https://www.pulumi.com/docs/install/)
+2. Configured your cloud provider credentials
+
Check [Getting started](https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/get-started/aws/review-project/) section to manage your infrastructure📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Use `make` command to set up project and automatically install all needed dependencies | |
| > make start | |
| Check [Getting started](https://terraspace.cloud/getting-started/) section to manage your infrastructure | |
| Check [Getting started](https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/get-started/aws/review-project/) section to manage your infrastructure | |
| Use `make` command to set up project and automatically install all needed dependencies | |
| > make start | |
| Before starting, ensure you have: | |
| 1. Installed [Pulumi CLI](https://www.pulumi.com/docs/install/) | |
| 2. Configured your cloud provider credentials | |
| Check [Getting started](https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/get-started/aws/review-project/) section to manage your infrastructure |
Migrate Infrastructure Provisioning from Terraform/Terraspace to Pulumi
Description
This pull request transitions our infrastructure provisioning and management from Terraform and Terraspace to Pulumi. The changes include:
Related Issue
This pull request addresses the following issue:
Transition from Terraform and Terraspace to Pulumi for infrastructure provisioning and management.
Motivation and Context
This change is required to transition our infrastructure provisioning and management tools to Pulumi. Pulumi offers a flexible, modern infrastructure-as-code platform that enables programming in familiar languages and provides high compatibility with our current setup. This transition aligns with VilnaCRM's core values, as Pulumi is open-source, unlike Terraform, which recently changed its license. Additionally, Pulumi improves workflow efficiency and maintainability for our DevOps processes.
How Has This Been Tested?
All Pulumi configurations have been thoroughly tested to ensure they match the functionality of the existing Terraform deployments. Testing included:
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores
.gitignoreand.flake8to enhance project management and linting.