Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FEAT: Recommendation of better alternatives #61

Closed
2 tasks done
hostops opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

FEAT: Recommendation of better alternatives #61

hostops opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@hostops
Copy link

hostops commented Feb 21, 2025

Before submitting an issue, please check the following

  • I have searched for similar issues (both open and closed) and cannot find a duplicate
  • I agree to follow the Code of Conduct

Motivation

If user uses Gmail, Facebook or Reddit for example they might not even know the alternatives like ProtonMail, Mastodon or Lemmy exist.

Solution

When notifying users about abusing companies we could also recommend them better alternatives with high reputation.

ClintonCAT version

1.0

Platform

  • OS: Any
  • Browser: Any

Anything else?

No response

@hostops hostops added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 21, 2025
@WayneKeenan
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the idea, but because the knowledge resides in the wiki and this extension is just a thin view on to it, I think it's better to direct it at the CAT Wiki suggestion channel on Discord.

@WayneKeenan
Copy link
Owner

WayneKeenan commented Feb 21, 2025

If/when your idea is implemented by the wiki team then this issue can be re-opened to expose the functionality by the extension. (e.g. pull any recommendations from the wiki into the extension's pages_db.json and add the info/link(s) to the alert)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants