We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
edoc
I usually write %% @private between a function's -spec(_). and its declaration, like so:
%% @private
-spec(_).
-spec add(A :: integer(), B :: integer()) -> integer(). %% @private add(A, B) ->
erlfmt prefers it like
erlfmt
OTP code has pretty much no occurrences of %% @private, but some %% @private.
Should, generically speaking, %% @ be an exception to "comments"?
%% @
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Oh, if %% @private is before -spec(_). the "issue" doesn't happen.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This seems similar to a problem we have discovered before #94 I hope it is okay, if I close this and merge it in that issue.
No branches or pull requests
I usually write
%% @private
between a function's-spec(_).
and its declaration, like so:erlfmt
prefers it likeOTP code has pretty much no occurrences of
%% @private
, but some%% @private
.Should, generically speaking,
%% @
be an exception to "comments"?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: