You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think this sorting works well but is non-intuitive in that it sorts based on total weight, not in a consistent order.
I have had tasks that meet multiple of these and figuring out how to sort consistently can be a pain.
I would prefer to sort based on a simple list-based comparator, so rather than assigning points to each item, you simply list the order you would like the sort to happen, for example:
example:
now, priority (asc), due (asc), date (asc), title (alphabetical ascending)
Basically just be able to provide a list and then it custom sorts on that.
From original comment:
I think this sorting works well but is non-intuitive in that it sorts based on total weight, not in a consistent order.
I have had tasks that meet multiple of these and figuring out how to sort consistently can be a pain.
I would prefer to sort based on a simple list-based comparator, so rather than assigning points to each item, you simply list the order you would like the sort to happen, for example:
example:
now, priority (asc), due (asc), date (asc), title (alphabetical ascending)
Basically just be able to provide a list and then it custom sorts on that.
Down the road something I can look at :)
Originally posted by @stacksjb in #804 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: