Secondary link - should it be blank? #2924
Closed
matteason
started this conversation in
Exit this page
Replies: 1 comment
-
Ah sorry, ignore this - it looks like the example was updated while I was writing this |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Firstly congratulations on shipping this component - it looks like a lot of thoughtful research and work has gone into it.
I noticed that in the secondary link example the link has no text content. Can I check whether this is intentional?
Visually, when the link has focus it's just a yellow box, which could be confusing:
In NVDA the link is read as 'weather' (if there's no path in the URL it reads the domain name). It may not be clear what the link is for.
I think this is probably just an oversight in the documentation, but if it's intentional it could probably do with a bit of explanation on the page.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions