Incorrect numbers in dhatu prakriya

[samvadah]

why are these numbers seen here? They are not sutra numbers. @neeleshb

[akprasad]

Thanks for your comment. Vidyut is just responsible for prakriyas, so I have no comment on the numbers here.

If I understand your question, though, I think these are numbers for Dhatupatha sutras.

Moving discussion here: ashtadhyayi-com/data#301

[samvadah]

I am very sorry to attach wrong image. Here is the correct image.

[akprasad]

Thanks, this helps a lot.

The first number is pointing to a Dhatupatha ganasutra https://ashtadhyayi.com/dhatu/10.0493 which indicates that the dhatu is mit.

The second number points to a special exception cited in Siddhanta Kaumudi 2570, specifically:

ञित्करणसामर्थ्यादस्य णिज्विकल्पः

https://ashtadhyayi.com/sutraani/sk2570

This format is not ideal. Let me know how it might be improved.

[samvadah]

Can it display ६.४.९२? with a note:

चुरादिगणे विद्यमानाः ज्ञपँ १०.११८ इत्यस्मात् आरभ्य चि १०.१२४ इति यावन्तः धातवः अनेन गणसूत्रेण मितः भवन्ति।

Additionally, can it show ७.३.३६ with a note:

ञित्करणसामर्थ्यादस्य णिज्विकल्पः। (Siddhanta Kaumudi)

and follow the same structure elsewhere too.

Also it seems, reaction feature to replies is not working as intended.

[samvadah]

Are you there, Sir?

[akprasad]

Yes! Sorry, busy with other things.

Sure, I think we can add this. I think Vidyullekha as a demo might be deprecated soon as we move to our new setup, but I'll make sure this gets addressed.

(For contributors -- the fix is to make sure we fetch this text directly from kaumudi.tsv and dhatupatha-ganasutras.tsv )

[samvadah]

I hope you have an idea of how much respect we have for you guys even if we aren't able to express it. I don't know which words can express my gratitude for the initiative of ambuda. I suggest more books ( with personal request of manusmriti with 9 commentaries) be added to ambuda library. It makes it searchable in search engines and easier to copy and share. Again, Thank you.

…

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025, 9:24 PM Arun Prasad ***@***.***> wrote: Yes! Sorry, busy with other things. Sure, I think we can add this. I think Vidyullekha as a demo might be deprecated soon as we move to our new setup, but I'll make sure this gets addressed. (For contributors -- the fix is to make sure we fetch this text directly from kaumudi.tsv and dhatupatha-ganasutras.tsv ) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#152 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BEKXERK635ZS5OFVMLZNVND2J7ULNAVCNFSM6AAAAABU3NYWSGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKOBTGAZTGMRSGA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>