Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add setter method to EDBPadstackInstance.pin_number #2436

Closed
Marcel0000 opened this issue Feb 7, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Add setter method to EDBPadstackInstance.pin_number #2436

Marcel0000 opened this issue Feb 7, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New features or code improvements

Comments

@Marcel0000
Copy link

Marcel0000 commented Feb 7, 2023

Description of the feature

It would be great to have a setter method for pin numbers to EDBPadstackInstance.pin_number.

This should enable the possibility to rename pins easily without trigger pin removal from the component, as it is currently the case, when editing the pin name.

Steps for implementing the feature

No response

Useful links and references

https://aedt.docs.pyansys.com/release/0.6/EDBAPI/_autosummary/pyaedt.edb_core.edb_data.padstacks_data.EDBPadstackInstance.pin_number.html#pyaedt.edb_core.edb_data.padstacks_data.EDBPadstackInstance.pin_number

@Marcel0000 Marcel0000 added the enhancement New features or code improvements label Feb 7, 2023
@hui-zhou-a hui-zhou-a added the edb label Oct 27, 2023
@hui-zhou-a hui-zhou-a self-assigned this Oct 27, 2023
@hui-zhou-a hui-zhou-a linked a pull request Oct 27, 2023 that will close this issue
@hui-zhou-a
Copy link
Contributor

hui-zhou-a commented Oct 27, 2023

@Marcel0000 , unfortunately the core code doesn't allow pyaedt to change the pin number.

@hui-zhou-a hui-zhou-a removed a link to a pull request Nov 13, 2023
@hui-zhou-a
Copy link
Contributor

@Marcel0000 I have done many experiments. It is a technical limitation.

@Marcel0000
Copy link
Author

@ring630 alright, thanks for checking this out!

@Samuelopez-ansys
Copy link
Member

@ring630 If it is a technical limitation of EDB, could we close this issue?

@hui-zhou-a
Copy link
Contributor

@Samuelopez-ansys Yes. I am closing it now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New features or code improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants