Fix the test 'test_user_agent_passed' without skipping it

[shunping]

• Here we skip the credential authentication, and
• we also mock gcp_bigquery so it won't raise an exception that causes this test to be skipped.

Please add a meaningful description for your change here

---

Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

• Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
• Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
• If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

[bvolpato]

LGTM

I have the context, but I think you could add a brief comment explaining why mocking each

[shunping]

LGTM

I have the context, but I think you could add a brief comment explaining why mocking each

Do you mean the comment of this commit or the comment in code?

[bvolpato]

LGTM
I have the context, but I think you could add a brief comment explaining why mocking each

Do you mean the comment of this commit or the comment in code?

I meant in the code for future reference -- I should've highlighted that this is just a nitpick

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c713425) 38.34% compared to head (f10b925) 38.34%.
Report is 13 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #29422      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   38.34%   38.34%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         693      693              
  Lines      102199   102237      +38     
==========================================
+ Hits        39185    39199      +14     
- Misses      61422    61446      +24     
  Partials     1592     1592              

Flag	Coverage Δ
python	29.88% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[shunping]

LGTM
I have the context, but I think you could add a brief comment explaining why mocking each

Do you mean the comment of this commit or the comment in code?

I meant in the code for future reference -- I should've highlighted that this is just a nitpick

Thanks! I put more explanation in the commit message.

[github-actions]

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @jrmccluskey for label python.
R: @johnjcasey for label io.

Available commands:

• stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
• remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
• waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

[tvalentyn]

Thanks! I put more explanation in the commit message.

Nice, thanks. Noting for future changes that commit messages are not as easy to lookup as seeing a comment in the code.

[shunping]

Thanks! I put more explanation in the commit message.

Nice, thanks. Noting for future changes that commit messages are not as easy to lookup as seeing a comment in the code.

Understood. I will keep that in mind. Thanks for merging.