Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
I prefer upgrade to manylinux_2_28 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
x86 can stay on manylinux2014, upgrade to 2_28 for aarch64 is fine given that arm64 system only becomes popular in recent years. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, as mentioned in #5483, it seems unlikely that we can resolve this issue without upgrading the GCC version used for compilation. Perhaps it's time to drop the old
manylinux2014
and switch tomanylinux_2_28
instead.This change will update our minimum compatible glibc version to
2.28
.Our old version is
manylinux2014
, which targeted toCentOS 7 based, glibc 2.17
, supports the following:The new version will be
manylinux_2_28
, which targeted toAlmaLinux 8 based, glibc 2.28
, supports the following:What do you think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions