-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
False positive on simple test/text files. #1252
Comments
This is not reproducible on my systems, additionally tests would likely also catch if this were an issue. Following the instructions provided here results in the expected behavior of no duplicates when standard content scan is used. |
I understand your scepsis. To be fair I also wonder if I just overlook the obvious (that's why I also stumbled over the UX confusion about "hardness" -- see other comment of mine on an old and closed issue). Feel free to tell me what I shall check for... |
Was experimenting a bit more. Okay, I made it! How to reproduce
Are you using some sort of cash and not clearing former results maybe? Do you maybe save the cash/results into a file? (Oddly enough it survives a application restart too.) |
There is a hash cache. But it should check for size AND modification timestamps. Is your file system not correctly updating these? What file system are you on? Is it a network drive? |
Describe the bug
Finds duplicate on differing text files.
How to reproduce
aaa
baa
Select Application Mode "Standard" and Scan Type "Contents".
Expected behavior
Although the file size and file name are equal, since I selected "Contents", I expect no duplicates.
System
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: