From 07e380e6dba9ffc153164caa17ee5bf3846f881c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthew Lam <matthew.lam@avalabs.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 19:57:22 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] change to >= check

---
 .../src/CrossChainApplications/ERC20Bridge/ERC20Bridge.sol    | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contracts/src/CrossChainApplications/ERC20Bridge/ERC20Bridge.sol b/contracts/src/CrossChainApplications/ERC20Bridge/ERC20Bridge.sol
index 21d1d7e84..ba5f06a60 100644
--- a/contracts/src/CrossChainApplications/ERC20Bridge/ERC20Bridge.sol
+++ b/contracts/src/CrossChainApplications/ERC20Bridge/ERC20Bridge.sol
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ contract ERC20Bridge is IERC20Bridge, ITeleporterReceiver, ReentrancyGuard {
             // is not a "fee/burn on transfer" token, since it was deployed by this
             // contract itself.
             require(
-                totalAmount > primaryFeeAmount + secondaryFeeAmount,
+                totalAmount >= primaryFeeAmount + secondaryFeeAmount,
                 "ERC20Bridge: insufficient total fee amount"
             );
 
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ contract ERC20Bridge is IERC20Bridge, ITeleporterReceiver, ReentrancyGuard {
         // The secondary fee amount is not used in this case (and can assumed to be 0) since bridging
         // a native token to another chain only ever involves a single cross-chain message.
         require(
-            adjustedAmount > primaryFeeAmount,
+            adjustedAmount >= primaryFeeAmount,
             "ERC20Bridge: insufficient adjusted amount"
         );