New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

benchmark for sub-setting optimisation #80

Open

nilshempelmann opened this issue Aug 29, 2016 · 5 comments

Assignees

Member

nilshempelmann commented Aug 29, 2016

sub setting operations seems to be slow

nilshempelmann self-assigned this

Member Author

nilshempelmann commented Aug 31, 2016

@bekozi
subsetting for one file takes
sec: 121.710592985 with cdo
and
sec: 1452.59325314 with ocgis (spatial_wrapping=True)

bekozi commented Aug 31, 2016

@nilshempelmann Do you have a script for this? It would be good to have a file, subset geometry, etc. Thanks.

Member Author

nilshempelmann commented Aug 31, 2016

@bekozi
I put some code here:
https://github.com/bird-house/flyingpigeon/blob/master/notebooks/cdo_ocgis.ipynb

nilshempelmann mentioned this issue

benchmark for CASTf90 analogs process #48

Closed

Member Author

nilshempelmann commented Dec 3, 2019 •

edited

Loading

notebook is now here:
https://github.com/bird-house/notebooks/blob/master/sandbox/cdo_ocgis.ipynb

bekozi commented Dec 3, 2019 •

edited

Loading

If it's a bounding box trying setting optimized_bbox_subset=True: https://ocgis.readthedocs.io/en/latest/operations.html#optimized-bbox-subset

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment