You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to be able to use active from within data tables. There might be reasons for that to be forbidden because of implementation details. But as a user, I cannot see a reason why active is not allowed in data tables.
As I am working with models at different spatial resolution, being able to provide all data describing the graph compactly would be of great use. If I could use active from within data tables, I could drop the yaml file describing specific links or nodes.
As an example, I currently have to spread data defining each link in two separate places. links.csv
Similar for nodes. Because of this, I need to use Jinja templates to create the yaml, instead of providing all data with spatial granularity in one or a few data tables.
update Limited the issue to active, as template seems to be supported in data tables already, as indicated in the comments.
Version
v0.7.0.dev4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What can be improved?
I would like to be able to use
active
from within data tables. There might be reasons for that to be forbidden because of implementation details. But as a user, I cannot see a reason why active is not allowed in data tables.As I am working with models at different spatial resolution, being able to provide all data describing the graph compactly would be of great use. If I could use
active
from within data tables, I could drop the yaml file describing specific links or nodes.As an example, I currently have to spread data defining each link in two separate places.
links.csv
and links.yaml
Similar for nodes. Because of this, I need to use Jinja templates to create the yaml, instead of providing all data with spatial granularity in one or a few data tables.
update Limited the issue to
active
, astemplate
seems to be supported in data tables already, as indicated in the comments.Version
v0.7.0.dev4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: