New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Abstract polymorphic type definition to allow non-contenttype scenarios #2

Open

charettes opened this issue Jan 17, 2014 · 1 comment

Owner

charettes commented Jan 17, 2014

One should be able to define the type of an object based on another kind of field.

For example:

The first two characters of a string primary key might identify the type of the object;
An additional field (say tableoid in the case of PostgreSQL inheritance) could identify the type of the object.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

charettes added a commit that referenced this issue


          Fixed #2 -- Added an abstract base that don't rely on ContentTypes.

a575511

charettes added a commit that referenced this issue


          Fixed #2 -- Added an abstract base that don't rely on ContentTypes.

cf46f8f

Owner Author

charettes commented Jan 22, 2016

It's only missing tests and docs at this point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment