Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

performance of using GT 2d box #29

Open
burui11087 opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

performance of using GT 2d box #29

burui11087 opened this issue Jun 8, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@burui11087
Copy link

burui11087 commented Jun 8, 2018

Hi.

I want to see the bottleneck of F-pointnet 3D detection module. So I replace 2d detected boundingbox with groundtruth box. But the evaluated results are strange, easy/moderate/hard 3D AP is 70.52%,65.04%,60.53% separately. Following is how I do.

I modify the command_test_v2.sh to
python3 train/test.py --gpu 0 --num_point 1024 --model frustum_pointnets_v2 --model_path train/frustum_pointnets_snapshots/log_v2/model.ckpt --output train/detection_results_v2 --data_path kitti/frustum_data/frustum_carpedcyc_val.pickle --idx_path kitti/image_sets/val.txt train/kitti_eval/evaluate_object_3d_offline dataset/KITTI/object/training/label_2/ train/detection_results_v2

I delete --from_rgb_detection and replace frustum_carpedcyc_val_rgb_detection.pickle with frustum_carpedcyc_val.pickle

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant