Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package by feature, not layer #39

Open
Kwadz opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Package by feature, not layer #39

Kwadz opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@Kwadz
Copy link

Kwadz commented Dec 4, 2018

After doing some research, I got confirmation that folder-by-feature is superior to folder-by-layer in the majority of cases. To get some arguments we can read among others, this article, this one, or even this answer.

I think that the code of DDDSample should be refactored to follow this approach, or even using modules.

What do you think?

@orende
Copy link
Contributor

orende commented Oct 16, 2022

We've now discussed this and we agree that it's a good idea. We've added a ticket to our backlog to refactor to folder-by-feature.

@c5ms
Copy link
Contributor

c5ms commented Dec 13, 2024

How about this ticket now?
I think it depends on the size of your code base and arch, if microservice or not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants