You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We're using the cloudfoundry_network_policy resource of the community provider to allow container-to-container communication on our internal routes. There is no analogous resource in the new provider
Describe the solution you would like
A new cloudfoundry_network_policy resource to be able to fully migrate off of the community provider. The format of the old one is fine with me, but it would also be fine to change it.
Thanks for the feature request. We evaluate it and update the issue accordingly.
Community Note
Voting for Prioritization
Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request.
Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.
Volunteering to Work on This Issue
If you are interested in working on this issue, please leave a comment.
If this would be your first contribution, please review the contribution guide.
The provider uses the go-cf-client and network-policy is not supported by it at the moment and the client used by the community-provider is deprecated. Will need a discussion on the go-cf-client to support it first.
What area do you want to see improved?
terraform provider
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We're using the
cloudfoundry_network_policy
resource of the community provider to allow container-to-container communication on our internal routes. There is no analogous resource in the new providerDescribe the solution you would like
A new
cloudfoundry_network_policy
resource to be able to fully migrate off of the community provider. The format of the old one is fine with me, but it would also be fine to change it.Example of the old policy in use:
Describe alternatives you have considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: