We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
protocol.name
It occured to me that except for the singleProtocolLegacy in https://cs3org.github.io/OCM-API/docs.html?branch=v1.1.0&repo=OCM-API&user=cs3org#/paths/~1shares/post we don't really need the "name": "webdav" or "name": "multi", right? Can we remove it in singleProtocolNew and multipleProtocols?
singleProtocolLegacy
"name": "webdav"
"name": "multi"
singleProtocolNew
multipleProtocols
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I definitely remember a lot of resistance on that, because removing name essentially is a breaking change w.r.t. OCM 1.0.
name
Sorry, something went wrong.
Following my comment in #127, I think we can deprecate protocol.name in the prospect 1.2, and remove it with OCM 2.0.
No branches or pull requests
It occured to me that except for the
singleProtocolLegacy
in https://cs3org.github.io/OCM-API/docs.html?branch=v1.1.0&repo=OCM-API&user=cs3org#/paths/~1shares/post we don't really need the"name": "webdav"
or"name": "multi"
, right? Can we remove it insingleProtocolNew
andmultipleProtocols
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: