-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ONNX #4
Comments
@szha Thanks for the links! I'll look into the ONNX array API functions, and at a minimum add it to the "join" dataset, which compares across all libraries. |
@kgryte did you get a chance to look at ONNX? Let me know if you need anything else. |
I suspect part of the hold up here is that ONNX doesn't use Sphinx, so the tooling may not be as easily adjusted. Still would be good to include in the overview. |
|
Thanks @szha! Question about scope: is ONNX in principle interested to add all the listed functions/operators, or are there sets of functionality that are out of scope? Scrolling through the list one possible correction: ONNX's |
@rgommers good catch. thanks. In terms of scope, the ONNX steering committee and operator SIG lead are generally in favor of supporting the operators in the array library standard first. We haven't committed to implementing all the above operators yet, and the community will need to review the draft standard first to decide. |
We at ONNX are working on the roadmap and I'm proposing that we adopt the numpy array API definition and eventually the array API standard from the outcome of this work group. ONNX is a model exchange standard for the deep learning frameworks. The array API comparison exercise here is very helpful and it would be great if we could include the ONNX in the comparison here.
The definition of array API functions can be found here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: