You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Batched PIR protocols — https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/1262 — also built on top of BFV. It works really well for lots of small records and they compare against SealPIR, Spiral etc.
Naively rerunning a PIR protocol, we would leak which file is being accessed to the number of blocks retrieved. Can we reduce this leakage through batched PIR?
Compare the overhead against SealPIR etc for medium numbers of large payload sizes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dettanym
changed the title
Bitswap papers to read: 1) Batched PIR protocols — https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/1262 — also built on top of BFV. It works really well for lots of small records and they compare against SealPIR, Spiral etc. Naively rerunning a PIR protocol, we would leak which file is being accessed to the number of blocks retrieved. Can we reduce this leakage through batched PIR? 2) Other related work by Erik Daniel: Improving Bitswap Privacy with Forwarding and Source Obfuscation: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.03480.pdf Privacy-Enhanced Content Discovery for Bitswap: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10186387
Bitswap papers to read
Sep 13, 2023
Batched PIR protocols — https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/1262 — also built on top of BFV. It works really well for lots of small records and they compare against SealPIR, Spiral etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: