Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Simulation Contiki for blackhole #27

Closed
sonxay opened this issue Jun 19, 2017 · 22 comments
Closed

Simulation Contiki for blackhole #27

sonxay opened this issue Jun 19, 2017 · 22 comments
Labels
question

Comments

@sonxay
Copy link

sonxay commented Jun 19, 2017

hi....
My name is Sonxay , I am PhD student in VietNam.
first of all , i would like to say Thanks for your research RPL attacks
after i read your paper..could i have some question to ask you please.

  1. file serial.log : it likes got the problem
  2. I would like to improve your research : like i want to simulation more like: throughput , end to end delay and Packet delivery Ratio ....How can I do?
    Please help me
    hope i can get your answer as soon as
    thanks
    regard
    Sonxay
@dhondta
Copy link
Owner

dhondta commented Jun 19, 2017

Hey Sonxay, nice to meet you ! I'm glad you appreciate this project ! I'm always very happy to welcome newcomers on this repository.

About serial.log, if I correctly understand, you experience some problems with it. Could you post an error trace or something that could indicate an error ?

For your second question, I think this is more or less a duplicate of Issue #25 . I think you should get in contact with dmabm and SwitchIsMine for this matter as, unfortunately, I don't have time to spend on the project at this time. Please read and participate to Issue #25 , this should be an interesting sharing.

@dmabm
Copy link

dmabm commented Jun 20, 2017

Hello All,
I am still looking for a solution for this mattes for nearly three weeks. I can simply start collect-view tool with brand new simulation created with cooja simulator directly, but the problem is how to integrate that in to this project.

The other thing is I was able to load a simulation created using this Framework manually, with Contiki inbuilt cooja simulator. Then I run it manually while opening the collect-view too but that tool did not capture and data form any mote. But it seems serial port is connected to project since some of the serial logs can be observed once collect-view tool is connected.

I am also a graduate student and looking for a experimental test-bed for my research stuff and generate some results to get published. So far the RPL attack framework would be the best environment I fond. (Thanks to dhonta a lot) I am also planning to make some more attacks on this framework and see the behavior of some other parameters.

If I am able to figure it out this issue, surely I will post the solution as soon as possible.

@sonxay
Copy link
Author

sonxay commented Jun 20, 2017 via email •
edited by dhondta
Loading

@dhondta
Copy link
Owner

dhondta commented Jun 27, 2017

@dmabm : Did you manage to get your things work ? Or do you still have some troubles with the Collect View tool ?

NB: At a first sight, I don't figure out if your troubles are related to the following considerations but keep this in mind ; there was a change in the Javascript engine used by Cooja a few months ago. This means that, while the former version of Cooja used OpenJDK 7 with Rhino JS engine, it now uses OpenJDK 8 with Nashorn, which can cause some errors. For this problem, I added a few lines at the beginning of script.js which solved the problem while upgrading to OpenJDK 8, but I cannot confirm it is backward-compatible and pointed out that it already caused problems for @sonxay (see Issue #28 ). Maybe this change will still cause other problems...

@dmabm
Copy link

dmabm commented Jun 27, 2017 via email

@sonxay
Copy link
Author

sonxay commented Jun 28, 2017

Hi...how are you?

can I ask you some question ..?

could you tell me , how do you do the graph like the pics

how many minutes , did you run for the simulation to get the graph like this

hope i can get your askwer

thanks
regard
Sonxay

screen shot 2017-06-28 at 12 30 37 pm

@dmabm
Copy link

dmabm commented Jun 28, 2017

Hi Sonxay,

I ran like 2 minus to generate this type of graph. But I did not do it manually and these are automatically drawn or generated by the RPL attack Framework once a particular simulation is executed.

I have a questions about INT (Interference), what is this INT? and how it is calculated ? and What is this parentage (%) mean ? I need proper interpretations for my questions

Thank you
DMABM

@dhondta
Copy link
Owner

dhondta commented Jun 28, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Hi all,

@sonxay : As @dmabm told, the default duration of a simulation is 120 seconds and it automatically draws the graph. It uses a custom VisualizerScreenshot plugin in Cooja to get the WSN topology but also draws the DODAG with a graph library and puts the results in the subfolder results of your simulation folder. For the power consumption graphs, these are generated using pyplot while parsing the collected powertracker.log. Note that the duration can be configured through your experiment.json. For more information about configuring this, you can consult this additional documentation.

@dmabm : For the INT metric, I would consider the following :

  • Each mote is ON for a reduced period during a defined interval (for low power consumption purpose)
  • Each mote has an interference range (configurable through experiment.json) which influences, during its ON period, the transmission of other motes that are also ON in its interference range
  • INT thus expresses the contributions of other motes in the range of the considered one

More concretely :

  • Looking at Radio.java, you can see the following code :
   /**
   * Returns true if this radio had a connection that was dropped due to interference.
   *
   * @return True if this radio is interfered
   */
   public abstract boolean isInterfered();

[...]
public class PowerTracker extends VisPlugin {
  [...]
  public static class MoteTracker implements Observer {
    [...]
    public MoteTracker(Mote mote) {
      [...]
      } else if (radio.isInterfered()){
        lastRadioState = RadioState.INTERFERED;
      [...]
    }
    [...]
    public void update() {
      [...]
      /* Radio tx/rx */
      [...]
      } else if (lastRadioState == RadioState.INTERFERED) {
        accumulateRadioIntefered(now - lastUpdateTime);
      }

      /* Await next radio event */
      [...]
      } else if (radio.isInterfered()) {
        lastRadioState = RadioState.INTERFERED;
      [...]
      radioWasOn = radio.isRadioOn();
      lastUpdateTime = now;
    }
    [...]
    protected void accumulateRadioIntefered(long t) {
      radioInterfered += t;
    }
    [...]
  }
  [...]
}

This shows the control flow for managing the interference state of a mote ; while a mote has connections dropped due to interferences, the resulting period is added to the INT metric (radioInterfered in PowerTracker.java).

As a consequence, applied to the example of the flooding attack :

  • In the situation without the malicious mote, everything works fine, that is, with a reduced interference on each mote.
  • In the situation with the malicious mote, some motes are forced to more often remain ON and are thus more impacted by the interferences of their neighbors (e.g. the malicious mote 11 is impacted by motes 3, 7, 10 and has thus a non-negligible INT metric).

Answers to your questions :

  1. What is INT ? This is a metric that represents the interference of neighbor motes, that is, the time that the considered mote was unable to proceed due to interferences.
  2. How is it calculated ? An accumulator in the MoteTracker class instance sums all periods during which the mote remained interfered.
  3. What is the percentage ? The metric is normalized regarding the ON period of the mote.

Warning : Do not be confused regarding the ON metric ; in my previous explanation, I mention the ON period which is not the same. This period is this during which the mote remains turned on while the ON metric represents the period during which the mote remains turned on AND idle. This can be seen with the IDLE radio state in PowerTracker.java.

@dmabm
Copy link

dmabm commented Jun 28, 2017

Hi dhondta,

Thank you very much for your detail explanation. I requested those information since I am tiring to do this analysis in different way to interpret the same result in different way. I am going to count CPU, RX, TX separately and draw graphs manually using EXCEL. To do that I plan to use simulation generated data with different networks. That would be my 1st experiment and later I would like to do more similar experiments with some more different parameters instead of "POWER", in that case I may want to connect collect view tool with this Framework.

Thanks again
DMABM

@dhondta dhondta mentioned this issue Jun 28, 2017
Closed
@dhondta dhondta mentioned this issue Aug 6, 2017
Open
@dhondta
Copy link
Owner

dhondta commented Aug 6, 2017

Please refer to #31 .

@dhondta dhondta closed this as completed Aug 6, 2017
@dharejo
Copy link

dharejo commented Feb 19, 2018

hi all,
i am huma i am new user of cooja simulator em doing my thesis... dhondta abd dmabm can you both plz help me?
I want to know how plot the graph of delay, Packet Rx and Tx and energy consumtion?

@dharejo
Copy link

dharejo commented Feb 19, 2018

My last question is ... how to run two different motes on different protocols separately? kindly share the link or give me the detailed answer.

@dhondta
Copy link
Owner

dhondta commented Feb 22, 2018 via email

@dhondta
Copy link
Owner

dhondta commented Feb 23, 2018 via email

@dharejo
Copy link

dharejo commented Feb 25, 2018 via email

@dharejo
Copy link

dharejo commented Feb 25, 2018 via email

@abhiverma866
Copy link

abhiverma866 commented Feb 2, 2019 •
edited
Loading

simply set TARGET=z1 for using Z1 mote binary.

@IlhammB
Copy link

IlhammB commented Apr 7, 2024

Hello everyone,
Is there anyone who can help me implement the black hole attack in RPL COOJA by providing resources where I can find the code or things that can help me implement this attack?
Thank you very much.

@researchrinki25
Copy link

WhatsApp Image 2024-06-26 at 22 11 29

@researchrinki25
Copy link

hii sir I have this problem when i run cooja 3.0 by using vmware 17 on windows 10 platform. A few days before i make a simple udp client-server communication on that when i use collect view to take some mote information but didn't get any information like didn't show the all node in collect view, diidn't get any power usage of mote ,didn't get any node information and many more please guide me what i do to make a simulation on contiki-3.0 and how to get rid of this problem shown in image

@abhiverma866
Copy link

Hello everyone, Is there anyone who can help me implement the black hole attack in RPL COOJA by providing resources where I can find the code or things that can help me implement this attack? Thank you very much.

Use these files to implement blackhole attack [Contiki 3.0]
Blackhole.zip

@abhiverma866
Copy link

abhiverma866 commented Jul 1, 2024 •
edited
Loading

hii sir I have this problem when i run cooja 3.0 by using vmware 17 on windows 10 platform. A few days before i make a simple udp client-server communication on that when i use collect view to take some mote information but didn't get any information like didn't show the all node in collect view, diidn't get any power usage of mote ,didn't get any node information and many more please guide me what i do to make a simulation on contiki-3.0 and how to get rid of this problem shown in image

Probably you need to recompile Cooja in case of such errors. I recommend switching to Contiki-NG for better support and features.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
7 participants
@dhondta @abhiverma866 @dmabm @sonxay @dharejo @IlhammB @researchrinki25