You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
would it be possible to have the addition of ‘of’ each time we have a correlated name. For example, for this name, we see now:
father Νικομάχα which is confusing; could we rather have of added (father of Νικομάχα)?
2. Lexis and Onomastics informations are mixed like alternatively: could we have the informations in the logical order, see current status.
We have thus: DELG (Lexis) followed by DGEsp (belonging to Onomastics column); HPN (Onomastics); LSJ (Lexis) and then the written commentary, which belongs to Onomastics.
In fact, we should rather have:
all informations belonging to Lexis (DELG, and LSJ); after: all informations belonging to Onomastics (DGEsp, HPN and the commentary).
Could you please fix it? Thank you very much.
I am preparing 3 public presentations and very busy.
All best,
Sophie
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Magdalena,
would it be possible to have the addition of ‘of’ each time we have a correlated name. For example, for this name, we see now:
father Νικομάχα which is confusing; could we rather have of added (father of Νικομάχα)?
2. Lexis and Onomastics informations are mixed like alternatively: could we have the informations in the logical order, see current status.
We have thus: DELG (Lexis) followed by DGEsp (belonging to Onomastics column); HPN (Onomastics); LSJ (Lexis) and then the written commentary, which belongs to Onomastics.
In fact, we should rather have:
all informations belonging to Lexis (DELG, and LSJ); after: all informations belonging to Onomastics (DGEsp, HPN and the commentary).
Could you please fix it? Thank you very much.
I am preparing 3 public presentations and very busy.
All best,
Sophie
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: