Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SysD 5.0 review discussion - ServiceRegistry #75

Open
borditamas opened this issue Dec 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

SysD 5.0 review discussion - ServiceRegistry #75

borditamas opened this issue Dec 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
5.0 Core Specification The issue concerns fundamental Arrowhead specifications or documentation Core System: Service Registry The issue concerns the Core Service Registry system

Comments

@borditamas
Copy link
Member

The Arrowhead community is admonished to read and review the System Description (SysD) of ServiceRegistry v5.0 draft, available here:

Please read the document and share your comments and suggestions within this issue.

Antecedent: #63

@borditamas borditamas added the 5.0 label Dec 13, 2023
@emanuelpalm emanuelpalm added Core System: Service Registry The issue concerns the Core Service Registry system Core Specification The issue concerns fundamental Arrowhead specifications or documentation labels Feb 19, 2024
@jerkerdelsing
Copy link
Member

We need a Monitoring service that should be mandatory for all core microsystems and highly recommended for any application microsystem. Such Monitoring service need to be dynamically extendable with new interfaces while existing interfaces can be taken away. Each action will require a re registration of the Monitoring service to the service registry. Since this will create a number of Monitoring services being registered in each local cloud we need a clear connection to which microsystem own each Monitoring service. Open question on this should be done!

@jerkerdelsing
Copy link
Member

Create an OpenAPI spec for a Monitoring service, Jerker

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5.0 Core Specification The issue concerns fundamental Arrowhead specifications or documentation Core System: Service Registry The issue concerns the Core Service Registry system
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants