You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note that the current getCover option just rasterizes at 10x resolution and then aggregates (see here). Future implementation should avoid this so that one never needs 100x memory. Shouldn't be difficult - we just advance x and y at 0.1 rather than 1, and add 0.01 to the pixel at the rounded-down values of x and y.
Really enjoying how quick fasterize is. Do you still plan to implement the getCover option from raster? I'm currently trying to get rid of coastal cells on a rather large raster and this would be super useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: