You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is no common guidelines about how to support the version handling and how long we should support the deprecated endpoints. This issue is create to make a guidelines available across the community so that we adhere the same across different repositories
Motivation
We have different repositories adhering to different ways w.r.t version handling of endpoints, so this can be brought in as a common way to support them.
Exemplification
Benefits
Possible Drawbacks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree it would be good to have a common guideline on how REST APIs in general and version handling in REST APIs in specifically should work across tools in the Eiffel eco-system.
I guess we should get input from looking at for example Swagger, RAML, Open API. We could also look at this recommendation from Zalando before we decide on our best practices here: https://opensource.zalando.com/restful-api-guidelines/
We should collect the current used standards in our existing Eiffel eco-system tools and relate them to current best practices in the open source world and set our own baseline for such guidelines (or just point to an existing one).
Description
There is no common guidelines about how to support the version handling and how long we should support the deprecated endpoints. This issue is create to make a guidelines available across the community so that we adhere the same across different repositories
Motivation
We have different repositories adhering to different ways w.r.t version handling of endpoints, so this can be brought in as a common way to support them.
Exemplification
Benefits
Possible Drawbacks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: