You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
Is structuring my dataset like that an incorrect way of pretraining? E.g., will I-JEPA be incorrectly influenced by the "grouping" of images in each batch folder (even though each folder contains randomly assembled unlabeled images)?
Additionally, for pre-training I-JEPA on a new dataset composed of unlabeled data, what resolution should those unlabeled images be?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rringham
changed the title
Image folder structure for unsupervised pre-training
Image resolution & folder structure for unsupervised pre-training
Dec 13, 2023
I guess, it doesn't impact the way as in the dataset section they are not utilizing any labels to do the training. But you need to edit the scripts according to your use-case. Every image is resized to 224 x 224. If your base images are in good quality, resizing has a less impact as fidelity of the images is good.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Am exploring I-JEPA, wanted to make sure I understood what it's expecting in terms of the structure of
image_folder
- e.g., here's my config:Imagine my
image_folder
is structured like this - where each batch is a folder containing several thousand unlabeled images:Is structuring my dataset like that an incorrect way of pretraining? E.g., will I-JEPA be incorrectly influenced by the "grouping" of images in each batch folder (even though each folder contains randomly assembled unlabeled images)?
Additionally, for pre-training I-JEPA on a new dataset composed of unlabeled data, what resolution should those unlabeled images be?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: