-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Container Engine Refactor (CRI) #1589
Comments
/milestone 0.15.0 /assign but it won't be just one PR or one person working on it, a collaborative effort is needed |
The effort will continue during the next release. |
The effort is still going on right? @incertum |
Yes. So far we cleaned the API up, but we still need to improve the robustness and self-healing mechanisms if possible. I'll post more starting in 2 weeks ... |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
/milestone 0.19.0 Some incremental progress has been done here but container engines can still need some work |
/milestone 0.20.0 |
Considering falcosecurity/falco#3403, i think we can close this one. (i mean, no big effort/refactor/cleanup will be made on that area of sinsp since we are moving away from it). /close (Feel free to reopen if you feel this is still valuable!) |
@FedeDP: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Continue improvement suggestions from #1550
Prerequisites: More unit and e2e tests, especially also around cgroups.
Details to be added later.
Related:
@leogr @Andreagit97 @gnosek
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: