You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 30, 2020. It is now read-only.
Only the 127.0.0.0/8 IP address range stays on the loopback interface in Linux. Any other address space will be presented to the network as just another address. Consequently 169.265.169.254 will be shared out to at least the local network. This can cause problems if multiple people on the network are running ec2metadata at the same time. In fact, other users will be able to operate on my own assumed role.
I have not found a way to force Linux to treat 169.255.169.254 as it would 127.0.0.1 and truly keep it internal to the host. I'm still researching that. Possible workarounds are denying traffic (including arp) in iptables or going back to the old method of just using iptables entirely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Only the 127.0.0.0/8 IP address range stays on the loopback interface in Linux. Any other address space will be presented to the network as just another address. Consequently 169.265.169.254 will be shared out to at least the local network. This can cause problems if multiple people on the network are running ec2metadata at the same time. In fact, other users will be able to operate on my own assumed role.
I have not found a way to force Linux to treat 169.255.169.254 as it would 127.0.0.1 and truly keep it internal to the host. I'm still researching that. Possible workarounds are denying traffic (including arp) in iptables or going back to the old method of just using iptables entirely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: