You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I see that the elastic cloud config in the fluentbit type doesn't match the same in fluentd (fluentd is a plugin.secret and flunetbit is a string). I see that Pull Request #1169 set the fluentd type as a secret but was never ported to the fluentbit type, is there any reason for this ?
Describe the solution you'd like
To allow the end user to configure cloud fields as secret pointers instead of strings in the fluentbit es output. Or if possible a union type that would allow the two to be interchangeable
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I see that the elastic cloud config in the fluentbit type doesn't match the same in fluentd (fluentd is a plugin.secret and flunetbit is a string). I see that Pull Request #1169 set the fluentd type as a secret but was never ported to the fluentbit type, is there any reason for this ?
Describe the solution you'd like
To allow the end user to configure cloud fields as secret pointers instead of strings in the fluentbit es output. Or if possible a union type that would allow the two to be interchangeable
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: