Uniform syntax for column pointer expressions through table references #1244
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since the advent of a new syntax for alias columns in the form of
and the upcoming CTE feature that uses the same notation:
it would be very convenient and again a huge improvement to the legibility of SQL statement expressions if column pointers can be formed using the same syntax.
Additionally, this PR contains the following improvements:
storage.count(column<Derived>(&Derived::id))
works)It must be clarified how a "table reference" can be created. Currently available: