Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for precalculating contract address before deploy #395

Closed
1 task done
cptartur opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #433
Closed
1 task done

Support for precalculating contract address before deploy #395

cptartur opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #433
Assignees
Labels
feature New feature request/description

Comments

@cptartur
Copy link
Member

cptartur commented Aug 3, 2023

Must be resolved before this is started

It is useful to target constructor code with cheatcodes

@cptartur cptartur converted this from a draft issue Aug 3, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the new label Aug 3, 2023
@cptartur cptartur added blocked Component: Forge feature New feature request/description and removed new labels Aug 3, 2023
@cptartur cptartur moved this from Backlog to TODO in Starknet foundry Aug 3, 2023
@piotmag769 piotmag769 removed the blocked label Aug 7, 2023
@MaksymilianDemitraszek MaksymilianDemitraszek changed the title Implement prepare cheatcode Support for precalculating contract address before deploy Aug 7, 2023
@tkumor3 tkumor3 linked a pull request Aug 8, 2023 that will close this issue
5 tasks
@piotmag769 piotmag769 mentioned this issue Aug 8, 2023
5 tasks
@piotmag769 piotmag769 moved this from TODO to In Progress in Starknet foundry Aug 9, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Starknet foundry Aug 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature request/description
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants