You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, regardless of the filter type (selection or numeric), we use a dropdown, or a text-search with autocomplete if there are enough possibilities.
This would be clunky for GX settings, however, which has 101 values ranging from 0% to 100%. In this case at least, maybe a number input with up/down arrows would work better. And/or a slider widget (quite intuitive for settings).
Also consider other numeric filters such as X settings. My understanding is that X settings are extremely fine-grained, and you can't even tell what the exact value is unless you're looking at the RAM, so it wouldn't make sense to make filters for exact values. So the filter values would probably be something like: -7 to -6, -6 to -5, ..., +6 to +7. About 14 filter values in that case, which actually is reasonable for a dropdown.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now, regardless of the filter type (selection or numeric), we use a dropdown, or a text-search with autocomplete if there are enough possibilities.
This would be clunky for GX settings, however, which has 101 values ranging from 0% to 100%. In this case at least, maybe a number input with up/down arrows would work better. And/or a slider widget (quite intuitive for settings).
Also consider other numeric filters such as X settings. My understanding is that X settings are extremely fine-grained, and you can't even tell what the exact value is unless you're looking at the RAM, so it wouldn't make sense to make filters for exact values. So the filter values would probably be something like: -7 to -6, -6 to -5, ..., +6 to +7. About 14 filter values in that case, which actually is reasonable for a dropdown.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: