You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ideally human would be first followed by MODs. This could be a configuration, or alternatively scoring each gene by number of experimental annotations would be a nice generic way to do it. This would be an easy field for @hdietze to add when loading.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What this would boil down to would be two new fields, say: search_bin_priority_one and search_bin_priority_two. Human genes would populate the first one, MODs get the second, everybody else gets none.
The search would then be boosted on those two fields, say: search_bin_priority_one^4.0 search_bin_priority_two^2.0.
Trying to find beta catenin in human, nearly impossible; e.g.
http://amigo2-test.stanford.edu/amigo/search/bioentity?q=CTNNB1
Ideally human would be first followed by MODs. This could be a configuration, or alternatively scoring each gene by number of experimental annotations would be a nice generic way to do it. This would be an easy field for @hdietze to add when loading.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: