Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

External Search for existing annotations #41

Open
tmushayahama opened this issue Mar 12, 2018 · 6 comments
Open

External Search for existing annotations #41

tmushayahama opened this issue Mar 12, 2018 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tmushayahama
Copy link
Contributor

This feature lets you quickly do an "external search" to Golr server for existing annotations for that particular GP and aspect. It works just like the Component Companion.

In Brief

Step 1 - Enter Gene Product

image

Step 2 - Select 1 or more rows and Click Save

image

Step 3 - Your fields are populated

image

@thomaspd Can you explain in more details.
@kltm @cmungall

@tmushayahama tmushayahama self-assigned this Mar 12, 2018
@tmushayahama tmushayahama changed the title External Search Database External Search for existing annotations Mar 12, 2018
@cmungall
Copy link
Member

is this scheduled for 1.0?

@thomaspd
Copy link

thomaspd commented Mar 12, 2018 via email

@thomaspd
Copy link

The major use case is for curators trying to create a larger "pathway" or other model, using annotations that are already in the GO database. This was in the original spec Huaiyu and I drew up years ago, and multiple curation groups asked for this functionality during the Noctua demos at EBI and the Corvallis meeting. UCL was waiting for this functionality before creating larger models for SynGO.

@tmushayahama
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmungall @kltm from the earlier conversation about groups,

  1. Is there a way to attribute (providedBy) on each evidence node when a user is using annotations that are already in the GO database?
  2. If(1) then how do I easily get the uri from the group shorthand?

@kltm
Copy link
Member

kltm commented Mar 14, 2018

This sounds like:
geneontology/noctua#539 (comment)
geneontology/noctua#458 (comment)

I believe the current function companion technically accomplishes your 1 (and maybe 2), but I think we want to revisit if that is really what we want to do. As well, we should not have independent implementations of this translation.

@vanaukenk
Copy link

Also see: #78

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants