Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Biological Process GO terms displayed with GO-CAMs not following part_of chains (Alliance KANBAN-126) #7

Open
kltm opened this issue Feb 2, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@kltm
Copy link
Member

kltm commented Feb 2, 2022

Shadowing for our accounting: https://agr-jira.atlassian.net/browse/KANBAN-126

@kltm
Copy link
Member Author

kltm commented Feb 2, 2022

Tagging @vanaukenk @tmushayahama @dustine32

@kltm kltm transferred this issue from geneontology/noctua-alliance-pathway-preview Feb 2, 2022
@dustine32
Copy link

@vanaukenk Using example model epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway via MAPK cascade (C. elegans) and concentrating on GP let-60 here:
image
This GP is currently only displayed in the pathway widget right-side pane under its directly-connected process, "Ras protein signal transduction":
image
Sounds like this GP should really be added under BP GO:0005006 "epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway via MAPK cascade", which it's indirectly-connected to via the part_of chain:
image
Two questions:

  1. Should the above arrow represent a copy or a move of let-60 into the indirectly-connected BP GO:0005006 "epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway via MAPK cascade"?
  2. If all GPs in this model are all indirectly connected to GO:0005006, should GO:0005006 be the only BP grouping in the pathway widget right-side pane?

@kltm
Copy link
Member Author

kltm commented Mar 17, 2022

@tmushayahama Has this work underway.

@vanaukenk
Copy link

Needs testing on noctua-dev Alliance Pathway Preview workbench
@vanaukenk @ukemi

@kltm kltm moved this to [Ready for testing on noctua-dev] in Alliance software support Aug 22, 2024
@vanaukenk
Copy link

It's been a while, but we should review this ticket in the context of work on the right-hand panel to make sure we're happy with the display.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: [Ready for testing on noctua-dev]
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants