Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Refactor to use HttpClientFactory for HTTP client management #231

Open
guibranco opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event help wanted Extra attention is needed 🕔 high effort A task that can be completed in a few days 👷🏼 infrastructure Infrastructure-related tasks or issues 🧑‍💻 tech-debit Technical debt that needs to be addressed 🧪 tests Tasks related to testing

Comments

@guibranco
Copy link
Owner

guibranco commented Feb 21, 2024

Description

We need to refactor the HTTP client integration library to use HttpClientFactory instead of directly instantiating HttpClient. Using HttpClientFactory will help manage the lifecycle of HttpClient instances more effectively, improve performance, and avoid potential issues related to DNS changes and socket exhaustion.

Problem Statement

  • Current Issue: The library currently instantiates HttpClient directly within the classes, leading to potential problems such as socket exhaustion and inefficient resource management. This approach does not take advantage of the benefits provided by HttpClientFactory.
  • Impact: Refactoring to use HttpClientFactory will enhance the library's performance and reliability by managing HttpClient instances in a more scalable and efficient manner.

Proposed Solution

  • Refactor HTTP Client Instantiation:
    • Update the library to use HttpClientFactory for creating HttpClient instances instead of direct instantiation.
    • Modify the code to inject IHttpClientFactory where needed and use it to obtain HttpClient instances.

Implementation Steps

  1. Update Dependencies:

    • Ensure that the project references the necessary NuGet package for HttpClientFactory. If using ASP.NET Core, this is included by default.
  2. Refactor HTTP Client Usage:

    • Identify all instances where HttpClient is directly instantiated.
    • Replace these instances with HttpClientFactory by injecting IHttpClientFactory and using it to create HttpClient instances.
    public class MyService
    {
        private readonly HttpClient _httpClient;
    
        // Inject IHttpClientFactory into the constructor
        public MyService(IHttpClientFactory httpClientFactory)
        {
            _httpClient = httpClientFactory.CreateClient();
        }
    
        public async Task<string> GetDataAsync()
        {
            var response = await _httpClient.GetAsync("https://api.example.com/data");
            response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
            return await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
        }
    }
  3. Configure HttpClientFactory:

    • If necessary, configure named or typed clients for specific scenarios. This configuration can be done in the Startup.cs or wherever dependency injection is configured.
    public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
    {
        services.AddHttpClient<MyService>(client =>
        {
            client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://api.example.com/");
            client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add("Accept", "application/json");
        });
    }
  4. Test Refactoring:

    • Ensure that all existing tests are updated to reflect the changes in HttpClient instantiation.
    • Verify that the refactored code works as expected and that HttpClient is managed properly by the factory.
  5. Documentation:

    • Update documentation to reflect the change in how HttpClient instances are created and managed.
    • Provide examples of how to use HttpClientFactory with the library.

Additional Notes

  • Review the impact of these changes on existing functionalities and test thoroughly to ensure that there are no regressions.
  • Coordinate with the team to ensure that the refactoring aligns with best practices for HttpClient management.!
@guibranco guibranco added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 21, 2024
@guibranco guibranco changed the title [FEATURE] Use HttpClientFactory instead of manual instance creation [FEATURE] Refactor to use HttpClientFactory for HTTP client management Sep 13, 2024
@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai bot added the gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. label Nov 8, 2024
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the 🛠 WIP Work in progress label Nov 8, 2024
@guibranco guibranco removed the gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. label Nov 15, 2024
@gstraccini gstraccini bot removed the 🛠 WIP Work in progress label Nov 16, 2024
@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai bot added the gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. label Dec 27, 2024
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the 🛠 WIP Work in progress label Dec 27, 2024
@gstraccini gstraccini bot removed the 🛠 WIP Work in progress label Jan 8, 2025
@guibranco guibranco added help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event 👷🏼 infrastructure Infrastructure-related tasks or issues 🧪 tests Tasks related to testing 🧑‍💻 tech-debit Technical debt that needs to be addressed 🕔 high effort A task that can be completed in a few days and removed gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. labels Jan 8, 2025
@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai bot added the gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. label Jan 9, 2025
Copy link

gitauto-ai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

@guibranco Pull request completed! Check it out here #416 🚀

Note: I automatically create a pull request for an unassigned and open issue in order from oldest to newest once a day at 00:00 UTC, as long as you have remaining automation usage. Should you have any questions or wish to change settings or limits, please feel free to contact [email protected] or invite us to Slack Connect.

@gstraccini gstraccini bot added 🛠 WIP Work in progress and removed 🛠 WIP Work in progress labels Jan 9, 2025
@guibranco guibranco self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
@guibranco guibranco removed the gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. label Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event help wanted Extra attention is needed 🕔 high effort A task that can be completed in a few days 👷🏼 infrastructure Infrastructure-related tasks or issues 🧑‍💻 tech-debit Technical debt that needs to be addressed 🧪 tests Tasks related to testing
Projects
None yet
1 participant