You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to request a feature that indicates whether a saved item has been archived or not. For example, in a list or tag search. This could be achieved e.g. by displaying a sign or using a slightly different background color.
Best regards,
Michael
Describe the benefits this would bring to existing Hoarder users
It’s much easier to see the difference if you use a list as the ‚Read Later‘ option and don’t want to delete the item.
Can the goal of this request already be achieved via other means?
Better overview
Have you searched for an existing open/closed issue?
I have searched for existing issues and none cover my fundamental request
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to add here that that it would be great if archiving made the thing vanish from lists and overviews. But it still shows up in the search with the different indicators mentioned and also on the specific archived list. It does not lose its config, so if a link is unarchived, it shows again on the previous list it was on.
@lukanvanderlinde This used to be the case before, but we decided to change the semantic for archived to only mean "Hide from homepage". Maybe in the future, we can make this a user setting, feel free to open another issue for this.
Describe the feature you'd like
Hey,
I would like to request a feature that indicates whether a saved item has been archived or not. For example, in a list or tag search. This could be achieved e.g. by displaying a sign or using a slightly different background color.
Best regards,
Michael
Describe the benefits this would bring to existing Hoarder users
It’s much easier to see the difference if you use a list as the ‚Read Later‘ option and don’t want to delete the item.
Can the goal of this request already be achieved via other means?
Better overview
Have you searched for an existing open/closed issue?
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: