We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When invokining an action on a service, the service can be named alone as the first term:
MyService myAction 1
Should it not then be possible to use it alone as an argument:
@ var foo = MyService foo myAction 2 // Does not work
It already works if is written with the . action on @:
.
@
@ var foo = (@ . MyService)
The rule can be that when naming a service or variable alone, it is searched for in the current scope hierachy (the same effect as using @ . <name>.
@ . <name>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
When invokining an action on a service, the service can be named alone as the first term:
MyService myAction 1
Should it not then be possible to use it alone as an argument:
It already works if is written with the
.
action on@
:@ var foo = (@ . MyService)
The rule can be that when naming a service or variable alone, it is searched for in the current scope hierachy (the same effect as using
@ . <name>
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: