Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Choose (and implement) proper variable binning method #1

Closed
jcierocki opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8 or #9
Closed

Choose (and implement) proper variable binning method #1

jcierocki opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8 or #9
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jcierocki
Copy link
Owner

jcierocki commented Apr 17, 2020

Actually we tried two different approaches:

  1. scorecard: woebin + woebin_ply
  2. funModeling: discretize_rg

1st gives better results when it comes to IV and the package is lighter - but still, it would be good to check it.

Code is located in work1.R and funs.R files.

@jcierocki jcierocki added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 17, 2020
jcierocki added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2020
Added introduction to report file.
@jcierocki
Copy link
Owner Author

If we talk about special alternatives to the above-mentioned packages @Mixowo You can try smbinnig package, it's pretty old but The Lecturer showed it in the classes.

@jcierocki jcierocki linked a pull request May 4, 2020 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants