defining three.js with define()

[loldrup]

Will you consider using define() when defining THREE as a module?

"A module is different from a traditional script file in that it defines a well-scoped object that avoids polluting the global namespace. It can explicitly list its dependencies and get a handle on those dependencies without needing to refer to global objects, but instead receive the dependencies as arguments to the function that defines the module. Modules in RequireJS are an extension of the Module Pattern, with the benefit of not needing globals to refer to other modules."
http://requirejs.org/docs/api.html#define

also see:
http://requirejs.org/docs/commonjs.html

[jeromeetienne]

what would that bring ?

you can already include three.js with require.js if you want

[loldrup]

Awesomeness :)
Isn't that the modern/proper way to do it?
Den 22/10/2012 15.41 skrev "Jerome Etienne" [email protected]:

what would that bring ?

you can already include three.js with require.js if you want

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/8#issuecomment-9663910.

[jeromeetienne]

no, it is just one way. the one proposed by require.js

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:01 PM, loldrup [email protected] wrote:

Awesomeness :)
Isn't that the modern/proper way to do it?
Den 22/10/2012 15.41 skrev "Jerome Etienne" [email protected]:

what would that bring ?

you can already include three.js with require.js if you want

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/jeromeetienne/threejsboilerplate/issues/8#issuecomment-9663910>.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/8#issuecomment-9664588.