Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

A proper specification of reduction #35

Open
jespercockx opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

A proper specification of reduction #35

jespercockx opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jespercockx
Copy link
Owner

Currently the implementation of the evaluator is taken as trusted part of the specification. It would be nicer to have a separate specification of reduction (e.g. based on naive substitution) and then prove correctness of the AM-based evaluator with respect to it.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jespercockx