Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

celeba_spoof train out model vs the provided trained antispoofing model #40

Open
woxiaohan opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@woxiaohan
Copy link

I tested the provided trained antispoofing model "MN3_antispoof.pth.tar" on my video, and the spoof faces results is better than live faces. so i used entire celeba_spoof plus self-built data to train.
During the training, I verified that the optimal model obtained by training with the original celeba_spoof dataset and default parameters(only change datasets = dict(Celeba_root='./CelebA_Spoof') and test_dataset = dict(type='celeba_spoof') in config.py), but i did not achieve the corresponding effect of your provided model "MN3_antispoof.pth.tar" on my video.
Is the model you provided trained and verified only with the celeba_spoof dataset? or combined with LCC_FASDcropped and CASIA?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant