You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If a inline-record tag is used within a record-definitions tag/value, the scope of the defined record/tag is limited to inside that record-definitions tag.
So with the data: d9dffe8319e000826141616183d9e0008200d9dffe8319e000826142616281d9e0008201f6d9e0008202d9dffe8319e000826143616382d9e0008203d9dfff8419e000826149616902f6d9e0008204f6d9e0008205f6
or if the scope of record-definition is also limited to itself (not sure from my reading, but the defined tag structures and the examples seem to imply it is self-contained):
The spec says that the inner inline-record tag should not influence the outside of containing record-definitions tag:
So with the data:
d9dffe8319e000826141616183d9e0008200d9dffe8319e000826142616281d9e0008201f6d9e0008202d9dffe8319e000826143616382d9e0008203d9dfff8419e000826149616902f6d9e0008204f6d9e0008205f6
Decoder()
decoded to the following structure:but I expect to be either:
or if the scope of record-definition is also limited to itself (not sure from my reading, but the defined tag structures and the examples seem to imply it is self-contained):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: