Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AI Caveats #80

Open
clux opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

AI Caveats #80

clux opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested

Comments

@clux
Copy link
Member

clux commented Jan 17, 2025

Given the amount of hype from the AI sector, and unreasonable expectations people often have when going into using them, I have added a a warning to the guides section which links to third party AI stuff:

Please be skeptical with output from AI tools or agents. They sound confident, while frequently presenting severely misleading errors, and often erase the sources. Do not be surprised if its solutions turn out to be total nonsense.
Rust documentation and kube documentation is already extensive. Consider searching docs.rs/kube, kube.rs, and kube/discussions for important context

Raising this issue here as a space to discuss this. Is this appropriate? Too much? Too little? Not worth having at all? Not worth even mentioning AI?

Personally, I am so far on the side that thinks that some people are going to use this technology no matter what we say, and at least this gives us a place to seed some skepticism.

That said, I have only covered fundamental points. The message does not include any caveats about negative effects of people take AI solutions and plaster them around the internet. It also doesn't really say anything about the socially deleterious effects of allowing people not to interact with anyone when you are stuck (i.e. preferring an invented answer that may be wrong).

Suggestions welcome. Comments welcome.

Refs: #76 , kube-rs/kube#1638

@clux clux added question Further information is requested documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Jan 17, 2025
@nightkr
Copy link
Member

nightkr commented Jan 17, 2025

Looks good to me, in the spirit of harm minimization.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants