Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Making Basic JuMP Models #38

Open
ccoffrin opened this issue Jan 5, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Consider Making Basic JuMP Models #38

ccoffrin opened this issue Jan 5, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@ccoffrin
Copy link
Member

ccoffrin commented Jan 5, 2019

There has been some requests to simplify this code base. The idea would be to remove the Julia package and make it a collection of stand alone JuMP models.

Helper functions and metadata can be provided as part of the code to define instance subsets and best known solutions.

@chriscoey
Copy link

related effort: odow/MathOptFormat.jl#29

@ccoffrin
Copy link
Member Author

ccoffrin commented Jan 5, 2019

Nice! That's a good point, we should probably move this repor to MathOptFormat instead of JuMP models at some point.

@chriscoey
Copy link

I am looking at putting the ConicBenchmarkUtilities CBF conversion functionality into MOF.jl - see odow/MathOptFormat.jl#30

So I think it makes sense to converge on MOF

@ccoffrin
Copy link
Member Author

ccoffrin commented Jan 6, 2019

Sounds like a plan to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants