-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Next major roadmap #338
Comments
Note that there is another roadmap in #332. |
Yeah I saw it later, but not quite the same. Thanks for linking it. 👍 |
I would add supporting Symfony as |
@Jean85 |
I know, but since we're talking about Symfony, we could impact a great deal of upgrade issues, since it will drag any Symfony component with it. I would prefer to bump it upwards from |
Well, we generally have to make BC trick on library. For example, if we want to use a method introduce in v3.2, we have to make the usage conditional with support of As you said, there is a BC promise, but for end user. And to complete your sentence, the end user may upgrade to Symfony 3.4 without any issue. 😉 |
I've opened #359 to start development of this issue. Obviously a lot of tests are failing, but it's a starting point... Can we add a tool for automatic CS fixing in this roadmap? |
@Jean85 Funny to ask, I made one recently: https://flintci.io May we try it? 😄 |
I like automation and I do not have any strong preferences .. I used https://styleci.io in the past and liked it. but I am fine trying out something new. |
@lsmith77 The only lack of StyleCI for me is the absence of cli fix possibilities. This is why I made a bridge but this one is not compatible with php-cs-fixer v2 anymore. I'll try a PR for that. 👍
@Jean85 Sorry but I don't see which point this PR solve. 😕 |
Before solving those, IMHO we should get the build to green in #366, so we can define the range of deps that we want/are able to support... @soullivaneuh, @alexislefebvre are you able to help me? |
I think that we should add a note about the 2.x and master in order to explain that new features should go to 2.x. And that this version is still under development. nelmio/alice use something like this:
We'll also need to explain all the BC changes in order to ease the upgrade to 2.x. |
This issue is completed. |
According to #337 (comment), here is a roadmap for the next 2.0 major of this bundle:
src
andtests
) → [2.x] PSR-4 friendly structure #365This are ideas I got right know. Feel free to comment if you want to add/modify/remove any of them.
Also, feel free to participate to this next major. 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: