Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Adapt kernel module for LOONGARCH architecture #140

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 25, 2024

Conversation

wangrong1069
Copy link
Contributor

Adapt kernel module for LOONGARCH architecture.

Log: Adapt kernel module for LOONGARCH architecture.

Adapt kernel module for LOONGARCH architecture.

Log: Adapt kernel module for LOONGARCH architecture.
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见:

  1. arg_extractor.c文件中,新增了对CONFIG_LOONGARCH的检查,这是一个好的做法,可以确保代码在新的架构上也能正常工作。但是,需要确保这个宏的定义是正确的,并且已经在编译时包含了相应的头文件。

  2. #else分支中添加了#error指令,这是一个很好的错误处理方式,可以立即在编译时发现问题。但是,需要确保这个分支不会在正常情况下被执行,否则会导致编译失败。

  3. #elif条件判断中,case 1: // a0case 2: // a1的注释应该更详细一些,以便其他开发者理解这些寄存器的用途。

  4. 代码中没有对n参数进行范围检查,如果n的值不在预期的范围内,可能会导致未定义行为。建议添加参数范围检查,确保n的值在有效范围内。

  5. 代码中没有对返回值进行任何形式的检查或处理,如果regs指针为NULL或者regs中的寄存器值无效,可能会导致未定义行为。建议添加对regs指针和寄存器值的检查,确保代码的健壮性。

  6. 代码中没有对get_arg函数的返回值进行注释,建议添加对返回值的注释,说明函数的返回值代表的含义。

  7. 代码中没有对get_arg函数的异常情况进行处理,如果函数执行过程中出现异常,可能会导致程序崩溃。建议添加异常处理机制,确保函数的健壮性。

  8. 代码中没有对get_arg函数的输入参数进行注释,建议添加对输入参数的注释,说明参数的用途和含义。

  9. 代码中没有对get_arg函数的返回值进行错误处理,如果函数返回的值不符合预期,可能会导致程序出错。建议添加对返回值的错误处理,确保函数的健壮性。

  10. 代码中没有对get_arg函数的输入参数进行错误处理,如果输入参数不符合预期,可能会导致程序出错。建议添加对输入参数的错误处理,确保函数的健壮性。

Copy link

TAG Bot

TAG: 6.2.1
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

Copy link
Contributor

@re2zero re2zero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: re2zero, wangrong1069

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wangrong1069
Copy link
Contributor Author

/forcemerge

@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Dec 25, 2024

This pr force merged! (status: unstable)

@deepin-bot deepin-bot bot merged commit 2479c05 into linuxdeepin:master Dec 25, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants